Authors
Rozenfeld I. I.
MD PhD1
Chilikina D. L.
Student, Pediatric Faculty1
1 - Tver State Medical University, Tver, Russia
Corresponding Author
Rozenfeld Igor; e-mail: iiggo@mail.ru
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Funding
The study had no sponsorship.
Abstract
This article is a continuation of a series of studies on the optimization of techniques and methods of surgical operations for hernias of the esophageal aperture of the diaphragm and is based on the use of the author’s development of a model of a two-layer biocarbon mesh implant. The purpose of this study is to highlight the immediate and long-term results of using a double-layer biocarbon mesh implant in comparison with the standard method of using a polypropylene implant when operating patients with large and giant hiatal hernia. All patients were split into 2 research groups that underwent alloplasty with various implants: Group I of 221 patients who underwent alloplasty with a polypropylene mesh implant (171 patients with large hernias of 10-20 cm2) and 50 patients with giant hernias of the esophageal orifice with the area of the hernial defect exceeding 20 cm2); Group II of 79 patients who underwent an original alloplasty with a bi-layer biocarbon mesh implant (50 patients with large hernias and 29 patients with giant hernia of the esophageal orifice). Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo scale. De Meester index was used as a comparison criterion. The article discusses the results of operations of 300 patients for large and giant hernias of the esophageal aperture of the diaphragm, of which 79 were operated on using a prototype biocarbon double-layer mesh implant according to the author's patent. The paper presents immediate and long-term results. The results of surgical treatment are pilot and representative, which determine the further tactics and direction of improving operations to remove large and giant hernias of the esophageal opening of the diaphragm. For the first time, data on the use of the author's development of a bi-layer biocarbon mesh implant are presented and compared with a polypropylene mesh implant during an «on-line» plastic repair of large and giant hiatal hernia. Significant differences were obtained in relapses of all types in favor of a biocarbon mesh implant (5,6 versus 22,8%; p < 0,0001; Fisher's exact test).
Key words
large hernias of the esophageal aperture of the diaphragm, giant hernias of the esophageal aperture of the diaphragm, alloplasty, «onlay» plastic, biocarbon double-layer mesh implant, polypropylene mesh implant, surgery technique
DOI
References
1. Grubnik V.V., Malinovskij A.V. Kriticheskie aspekty laparoskopicheskoj hirurgii gastroezofageal'noj reflyuksnoj bolezni i grizh pishchevodnogo otverstiya diafragmy. [Critical aspects of laparoscopic surgery of gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal cavity.]« Odessa. VMV-tipografiya. 2015: 106 p. (In Russ.)
2. Rozenfel’d I.I., Akopyan V.A. Klassifikaciya negativny`h rezul`tatov laparoskopicheskih operacij pri gry`zhah pishhevodnogo otverstiya diafragmy. [Classification of negative results of laparoscopic operations for hiatal hernia]. Proceedings of the XII International Scientific and Practical Conference of Students and Young Medical Scientists »Youth for Practical Health Care«. Tver: FSBEI of Tver State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia. Council of Young Scientists and Students. 2018; 856-858. (In Russ.)
3. Rozenfel`d I.I., Chilikina D.L. Ocenka rezul`tatov ispol`zovaniya setchaty`h implantatov pri alloplastike gry`zh pishhevodnogo otverstiya diafragmy [Assessment of the results of using mesh implants in alloplasty of the hiatal hernia.] Issledovanie i praktika v medicine [Research and practice in medicine] 2018; 5 (4): 156-158. (In Russ.)
4. Rozenfel`d I.I., Chilikina D.L. Problema bol`shix i gigantskix gry`zh pishhevodnogo otverstiya diafragmy` i rezul`taty` osnovny`x metodov ix plastiki. [The problem of large and giant hiatal hernia and the results of the main methods of plastics.] Annaly` xirurgii [Annals of Surgery] 2018; 3: 74-79. (In Russ.)
5. Antoniou S.A., Koch O.O., Antoniou G.A. Mesh-reinforced hiatal hernia repair: a review on the effect on postoperative dysphagia and recurrence. Langenbeck's archives of surgery. 2012; 397 (1): 19-27. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0829-0
6. Frantzides C.T., Carlson M.A., Loizides S. Hiatal hernia repair with mesh: a survey of SAGES members. Surgical endoscopy. 2010; 24 (5): 1017-24. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0718-6
7. Furnée E., Hazebroek E. Mesh in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Surgical endoscopy. 2013; 27 (11): 3998-4008. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3036-y
8. Granderath F.A., Schweiger U.M., Kamolz T. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery with routine mesh-hiatoplasty in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery. 2002; 6 (3): 347-353. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)00025-7
9. Targarona E.M., Grisales S., Uyanik O. Long-term outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic treatment of large paraesophageal hernia. World journal of surgery. 2013; 37 (8): 1878-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2047-0