Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Economic Efficiency of Various IOL Models Implantation

Chuprov A. D.
Professor, Doctor of Medicine, Director¹

Startseva M. I.
ophthalmologist¹

1 - Orenburg branch of the S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Orenburg, Russian Federation

Startseva M.I., e-mail: nauka@mail.ofmntk.ru.

The study had no sponsorship.

None declared.

A great number of intraocular lenses of various models and manufacturers is present on the ophthalmic market. The difficulty lies in choosing a specific lens model for each eye. In this work, we compare the characteristics of some monofocal IOLs most often implanted in Orenburg branch of the S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution over the past 5 years, as well as the results of their implantation and the economic component. There were no significant differences in the medical efficiency of implantation of different models of lenses, and therefore the leading guideline for choosing an IOL may be the factor of economic efficiency.

monofocal intraocular lenses, choice of IOL model, cost-effectiveness

10.29234/2308-9113-2022-10-2-1-9

1. Voronovich T.F., Sivashko A.S., Kardash O.N. Vybor intraokulyarnoy linzy dlya implantatsii pri fakoemul'sifikatsi katarakty [The choice of intraocular lens for implantation in cataract phacoemulsification]. 2018. Available at: https://www.10gkb.by/informatsiya/stati/vybor-intraokulyarnoj-linzy-dlya-implantatsii-pri-fakoemulsifikatsi-katarakty Accessed: 06.08.2021. (In Russ.)

2. Gamidov A.A., Siplivyy V.I., Fedoruk N.A., Aslamazova A.E., Gamidov R.A. Pomutneniya intraokulyarnykh linz: rabochaya klassifikatsiya s obzorom problem [Intraocular lens opacities: a working classification with an overview of the problem]. Oftal'mologiya. Vostochnaya Evropa [Ophthalmology. Eastern Europe] 2018; 8(4): 575-585. (In Russ.)

3. Egorov A.E., Movsisyan A.B., Glazko N.G. Sovremennaya khirurgiya katarakty. Nyuansy i resheniya [Modern cataract surgery. Nuances and solutions]. RMZh. Klinicheskaya oftal'mologiya [Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology] 2020; 20(3): 142-147. (In Russ.)

4. Pershin K.B. Khirurgicheskaya korrektsiya presbiopii – sovremennye vozmozhnosti [Surgical correction of presbyopia – modern possibilities]. Rossiyskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal [Russian medical journal] 2016; 22(3): 146-152. (In Russ.)

5. Riks I.A., Astakhov S.Yu., Ivan'kova E.M. et al. Sluchai pomutneniya intraokulyarnykh linz v artifakichnykh glazakh: analiz rezul'tatov mikrostrukturnykh issledovaniy [Cases of clouding of intraocular lenses in pseudophakic eyes: analysis of the results of microstructural studies]. Oftal'mologicheskie vedomosti [Ophthalmology journal] 2020; 13(3): 21-28. (In Russ.)

6. Slepota i narusheniya zreniya [Blindness and visual impairment]. Informatsionnaya byulleten' VOZ [WHO fact sheet] 2021. Available at: https://www.who.int/ru/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment Accessed: 06.08.2021. (In Russ.)

7. Sorokoletov G.V., Zuev V.K., Tumanyan E.R. et al. Dinamika chastoty razvitiya vtorichnoy katarakty v artifakichnykh glazakh s sovremennymi modelyami zadnekamernykh IOL [Dynamics of the incidence of secondary cataract development in pseudophakic eyes with modern models of posterior chamber IOLs]. Kataraktal'naya i refraktsionnaya khirurgiya [Cataract and refractive surgery] 2014; 14(2): 23-26. (In Russ.)

8. Tereshchenko Yu.A., Egorov V.V., Sorokin E.L., Belonozhenko Ya.V. Issledovanie osobennostey razvitiya pomutneniy zadney kapsuly khrustalika posle fakoemul'sifikatsii vozrastnoy katarakty pri implantatsii IOL iz razlichnykh materialov [Investigation of the peculiarities of the development of opacities of the posterior capsule of the lens after phacoemulsification of age-related cataracts during IOL implantation from various materials]. Sovremennye tekhnologii kataraktal'noy i refraktsionnoy khirurgii 2012: Sb. nauch. tr. [Modern technologies of cataract and refractive surgery 2012: Collected papers]. Moscow, 2012. P. 152. (In Russ.)

9. Shpak A.A., Malyugin B.E., Fadeeva T.V. Vliyanie zheltogo svetofil'tra v optike intraokulyarnykh linz na sostoyanie makulyarnoy zony posle fakoemul'sifikatsii katarakty u patsientov s vozrastnoy makulyarnoy degeneratsiey [The effect of a yellow filter in the optics of intraocular lenses on the state of the macular zone after phacoemulsification of cataract in patients with age-related macular degeneration]. Vestnik oftal'mologii [The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology] 2012; 128(4): 48-51. (In Russ.)

10. Davison J.A., Patel A.S., Cunha J.P., Schwiegerling J., Muftuoglu O. Recent studies provide an updated clinical perspective on blue light-filtering IOLs. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2011; 249(7): 957-968.

11. Ichhpujani P., Bhartiya S., Sharma A. Premium IOLs in glaucoma. Journal of current glaucoma practice 2013; 7(2): 54.

12. Kim S.W., Ahn H., Kim E.K., Kim T-i. Comparison of higher order aberrations in eyes with aspherical or spherical intraocular lenses. Eye 2008; 22(12): 1493-1498.

13. Pandey S.K., Apple D.J., Werner L., Maloof A.J., Milverton E.J. Posterior capsule opacification: a review of the aetiopathogenesis, experimental and clinical studies and factors for prevention. Indian journal of ophthalmology 2004; 52(2): 99-112.