AboutContactsEditorial StaffEditorial CouncilArchiveFor AuthorsFor Reviewers

Calculation error of local radius of anterior surface curvature of the cornea by optical cuts as independent diagnostic characteristic of keratokonus (preliminary report)

Journal «MEDICINA» ¹ 1, 2019, pp.42-54 (Research)

Authors

Gridin V. N.
Doctor of Technology, Professor1

Novikov I. A.
Senior Researcher1; Senior Researcher, Laboratory for Fundamental Studies in Ophtalmology2

Solodovnikov V. I.
PhD, CTechSci, Laboratory Head1

Trufanov M. I.
Associate Professor, Laboratory Head1

Lebedev A. S.
Junior Researcher1

Bubnova I. A.
Doctor of Medicine, Leading Researcher1; Senior Researcher, Department for Refractive Disorders2

Borisenko T. E.
Consultant on Medical Statistics2

1 - Russian Academy of Sciences, Design Information Technologies Ñenter, Odintsovo, Russia
2 - Research Institute of Eye Diseases of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Remarks

Corresponding Author: Bubnova Irina Alekseevna e-mail: bubnovai@mail.ru. Funding: Research has been supported by grant of Russian Foundation for Basic Research “Theoretical bases development for the diagnosis of keratoconus at early stage” ¹ 18-29-02049 mk. Conflict of interest: None declared.

Abstract

Purpose: to evaluate significance of calculation errors of recognition and reconstruction of the cornea shape by analyzing of optical cuts images as independent diagnostic characteristic of keratokonus. Material and methods: In research series images of transverse optical cuts of the cornea of patients with I-IV stage keratokonus (24 patients, 24 eyes – 6 cases of each stage) and patients with regular corneal astigmatism as a control group (6 patients, 6 eyes) were included. In floating window for each image local curvature of corneal surface was calculated and its error numerically characterized. For evaluation of correlation between average error of calculation the radius of curvature of the anterior corneal surface with different stages of keratokonus each optical cut of the cornea was divided into 5 broad areas. In each area pairwise comparison of the calculation error of curvature radius for I and II stage of keratokonus as well as for control group using criteria of Mann-Whitney was done. Results: It was revealed that in control group average calculation error of the radius of curvature of the anterior corneal surface significantly differs (p<0,001) from such in groups with I and II stages of keratokonus. In control group average calculation error was near to 0,5 mm while in groups with I and II stages of keratokonus it was in 0,33-0,38 mm interval. Conclusion: evaluation of calculation error of the curvature radius of the anterior corneal surface can se used for creation of highly sensitive detectors of early keratokonus as independent diagnostic characteristic.

Key words

keratokonus, keratotopography, image recognition

DOI

References

1. Avetisov S., Novikov I., Pateiuk L. Keratokonus: ehtiologicheskie faktory i soputstvuyushchie proyavleniya [Keratoconus: etiological factors and accompanying manifestations]. Vestnik oftal’mologii [Russian Annals of Ophtalmology] 2014; 130(4): 110-116. (In Russ.)

2. Rabinowitz Y.S. Keratoconus. Survey of ophthalmology 1998; 42(4): 297-319.

3. Ramos-López D., Martínez-Finkelshtein A., Castro-Luna G.M., Burguera-Gimenez N., Vega-Estrada A., Pinero D., et al. Screening subclinical keratoconus with placido-based corneal indices. Optometry & Vision Science 2013; 90(4): 335-343.

4. Steinberg J., Aubke‐Schultz S., Frings A., Hülle J., Druchkiv V., Richard G., et al. Correlation of the KISA% index and Scheimpflug tomography in ‘normal’, ‘subclinical’, ‘keratoconus‐suspect’ and ‘clinically manifest’ keratoconus eyes. Acta ophthalmologica Supplement. 2015; 93(3): e199-e207.

5. Rabinowitz Y.S., Rasheed K. KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 1999; 25(10): 1327-1335.

6. Pflugfelder S.C., Liu Z., Feuer W., Verm A. Corneal thickness indices discriminate between keratoconus and contact lens-induced corneal thinning. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109(12): 2336-2341.

7. Binder P.S., Lindstrom R.L., Stulting R.D., Donnenfeld E., Wu H., McDonnell P., et al. Keratoconus and corneal ectasia after LASIK. Journal of refractive surgery. 2005; 21(6): 749-752.

8. Reinstein D.Z., Archer T.J., Gobbe M. Corneal epithelial thickness profile in the diagnosis of keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25(7): 604-610.