Current epidemiological situation of tick-borne encephalitis in an endemic region

Karpov A. N.¹
Postgraduate Student, Department of Disaster Medicine and Life Safety;
ORCID: 0009-0005-4463-8799; SPIN: 4332-1607

Timonin A. V.¹
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Medical Microbiology;
ORCID: 0000-0002-1048-6791; SPIN: 2254-5926

Shirokostup S. V.¹
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Disaster Medicine and Life Safety;
ORCID: 0000-0003-4492-2050; SPIN: 2017-9299

1Altai State Medical University, Barnaul, Russia

Arseniy N. Karpov; e-mail: karpovarseniusz@gmail.com

The study had no sponsorship support.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

03.04.2026

14.08.2026

Objective. To analyze the main characteristics of the tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) epidemic process in the Altai Krai during the modern period (2000–2024) and to evaluate the effectiveness of specific and nonspecific prevention on morbidity. Methods. The study is based on state statistical reporting data (Form No. 2), Rospotrebnadzor reports, and the results of entomological and virological surveillance (PCR, whole-genome sequencing). The study employs retrospective epidemiological analysis, calculation of intensive rates, Spearman's correlation analysis (r), Z-test for significance (p), as well as autocorrelation and Fourier spectral analysis to assess cyclicity. Results. The long-term average TBE incidence in the Altai Krai was 2.41±0.32 per 100,000 population, which exceeds the national average (2.06±0.04) by 16.99% (p<0.001). By 2024, incidence decreased 5.78-fold (to 0.90±0.21). A 10-year cyclicity of incidence and a 6-year cyclicity of the abundance and virus prevalence of ixodid ticks are revealed. The proportion of severe TBE forms was 43.78±1.31%; 25 fatal cases were recorded (all unvaccinated). An inverse correlation is demonstrated between incidence and the volume of vaccination (r=-0.32; p<0.05), emergency seroprophylaxis (r=-0.59; p<0.05), and the area of acaricide treatments (r=-0.70; p<0.05). No significant differences in incidence between urban and rural populations are found (p=0.763). Conclusion. The modern period (2000–2024) is characterized by the stabilization of TBE incidence in the Altai Krai at levels close to the national average due to increased volumes of vaccination, seroprophylaxis, and acaricide treatments. The identified 6-year cyclicity of tick virus prevalence allows forecasting of incidence dynamics. The absence of urban–rural differences indicates a significant role of anthropurgic foci, which requires their additional monitoring. Recommendations are given on the use of the obtained data for planning anti-epidemic measures in endemic regions.

tick-borne encephalitis, Altai Krai, epidemic process, vaccine prophylaxis, ixodid ticks, virus prevalence

10.29234/2308-9113-2026-14-3-103-114

1. Melnikova OV, Trushina YuN, Adelshin RV, Yakovchits NV, Andaev EI, Leonova GN. Analysis of laboratory methods for monitoring of tick-borne encephalitis natural foci. Sanitary Doctor. 2021;(9):26-32. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33920/med-08-2109-02.

2. Tokarevich NK, Tronin AA, Buzinov RV, Sokolova OV, Unguryanu TN. Analyzing risks of incidence of tick-borne encephalitis in areas with different climatic and geographical conditions. Health Risk Analysis. 2021;(4):127-135. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21668/health.risk/2021.4.14.

3. Chekanova TA, Rakov AV, Petremgvdlishvili K, Timonin AV, Lukyanenko NV, Safyanova TV et al. Bacterial infections transmitted by ticks in Barnaul: epidemiological and epizootological situation, diagnostic problems. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2024;23(3):57-66. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31631/2073-3046-2024-23-3-57-66.

4. Mishchenko VA, Vyalykh IV, Sergeev AG, Bykov IP, Toporkova MG, Chalapa VI. Clinical and epidemiological features of actual tick-borne infections under conditions of mass vaccination against tick-borne viral encephalitis (by the example of a megapolis). Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2022;21(6):82-88. (In Russ.). doi:10.31631/2073-3046-2022-21-6-82-88.

5. Bykov IP, Sergeev AG, Mishchenko VA, Vyalykh IV, Toporkova MG, Vyatkina LG et al. Clinical forms of tick-borne viral encephalitis in persons with co-infection. Epidemiоlоgy and infectious diseases. Сurrent items. 2022;12(1):70-75. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18565/epidem.2022.12.1.70-5.

6. Kolyasnikova NM, Ishmukhametov AA, Akimkin VG. The current state of the problem of tick-borne encephalitis in Russia and the world. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2023;22(1):104-123. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31631/2073-3046-2023-22-1-104-123.

7. Nikitin AYa, Adayev EA, Poltoratskaya TN, Poltoratskaya NV, Matyushenko YuS, Sorokina OV et al. Modern space-time features epidemic process of tick-borne viral encephalitis on the territory of the Tomsk region. Infectious Diseases: News, Opinions, Training 2023;12(4):65-72. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33029/2305-3496-2023-12-4-65-72.

8. Solovei NV. Modern approaches to tick-borne encephalitis diagnosis. Clinical infectology and parasitology. 2024;13(3):390-402. (In Russ.). doi: 10.34883/PI.2024.13.3.040.

9. Timonin AV, Shirokostup SV, Lukyanenko NV. Optimization of the system of planning for epidemiological control of the incidence of tick-borne encephalitis and Siberian tick typhus incidence in regions with combined foci of these infections. Yakut Medical Journal. 2022;(1):68-71. (In Russ.). doi: 10.25789/YMJ.2022.77.17.

10. Utenkova EO, Savinykh NA. Tick-borne encephalitis in Russia and Europe (review). Medical almanac. 2021;(2):13-21. (In Russ.)

11. Chekanova TA, Yankovskaya YaD, Petremgvdlishvili K. The current situation on the tick-borne encephalitis incidence and vaccination in the Russian Federation in comparison with the «preCOVID» period. Abstracts of the VI All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation (October 12–13, 2023); 2023:118-119. (In Russ.)

12. Skripchenko NV, Ivanova GP, Pulman NF, Vilnits AA, Skripchenko EY. Emergency prevention of tick-borne encephalitis in children: retrospective analysis and clinical cases studies. Practical medicine. 2022;20(1):80-88. (In Russ.)

13. Nikitin AYa, Andaev EI, Tolmacheva MI, Zarva ID, Bondaryuk AN, Yatsmenko EV et al. Epidemiological situation on tick-borne encephalitis in the Russian Federation in 2014–2023 and short-term forecast of the incidence for 2024. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2024;(1):48-58. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2024-1-48-58.

14. Andaev EI, Nikitin AYa, Tolmacheva MI, Zarva ID, Yatsmenko EV, Matveeva VA et al. Epidemiological situation on tick-borne viral encephalitis in the Russian Federation in 2022 and forecast of its development for 2023. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2023;(1):6-16. doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2023-1-6-16.

15. Chiffi G, Grandgirard D, Leib SL, Chrdle A, Růžek D. Tick-borne encephalitis: A comprehensive review of the epidemiology, virology, and clinical picture. Rev Med Virol. 2023 Sep;33(5):e2470. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2470.

16. Karmokov IA, Riabiko EG, Blinova OV, Kolosovskaya EN, Tokarevich NK. Epidemic status in Russia’s Northwestern Federal District: tick-borne encephalitis and ixodes tick-borne borreliosis (lyme disease), 2002–2021. Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity. 2023;13(5):909-922. doi: 10.15789/2220-7619-TES-12118.

17. Mittova V, Tsetskhladze ZR, Motsonelidze C, Palumbo R, Vicidomini C, Roviello GN. Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV): Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Therapeutic Approaches and Some Molecular Aspects – An Updated Review. Microbiology Research. 2024; 15(4):2619-2649. doi: 10.3390/microbiolres15040174.

18. Shirokostup SV, Lukyanenko NV. Tick-borne encephalitis epidemiology in Western Siberia. Natural and Technical Sciences. 2021;11(162):130-136. doi: 10.25633/ETN.2021.11.09.

19. Worku DA. Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE): From Tick to Pathology. J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 30;12(21):6859. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216859.